MEMORANDUM **

Marco Stefan Uneputty and Debby Engeline, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider where the motion was untimely and petitioners failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s previous decision affirming an immigration judge’s removal order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1), (2).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to grant petitioners’ motion to reconsider sua sponte. See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder, 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir. 2011).

In light of our disposition, we need not address petitioners’ remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.