U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Bellina Aryani v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Bellina Aryani v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2011

Bellina Aryani v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 01 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HECTOR BALTAZAR MOLINA, No. 08-73935 Petitioner, Agency No. A075-576-702 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 15, 2011 ** Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Hector Baltazar Molina, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Molina’s motion to reopen where he failed to establish that ineffective assistance of counsel may have affected the outcome of his case. See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir. 2003) (to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim a petitioner must demonstrate prejudice).

Molina’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 08-73935

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.