United States v. Waine Vassel

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Waine Vassel, 462 F. App'x 712 (9th Cir. 2011)
Goodwin, Wallace, McKeown

United States v. Waine Vassel

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Waine Edward Vassel appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 108-month sentence imposed for possession with the intent to deliver marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(l)(B)(vii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Vassel’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Waine Edward VASSEL, A.K.A. Harper, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished