United States v. Roberto Cortez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Roberto Cortez

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50066

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-03644-WQH-1 v.

MEMORANDUM * ROBERTO CORTEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Roberto Cortez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cortez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cortez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

AFFIRMED.

2 11-50066

Reference

Status
Unpublished