U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Roberto Cortez

United States v. Roberto Cortez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 21, 2011

United States v. Roberto Cortez

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 21 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50066 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-03644-WQH-1 v. MEMORANDUM * ROBERTO CORTEZ, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 19, 2011 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Roberto Cortez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cortez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cortez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

AFFIRMED.

2 11-50066

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.