U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest Service

Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest Service
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 12, 2011 · Kozinski, Rawlinson
658 F.3d 953; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18823 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Roger Flynn, Jeffrey Charles Parsons, Senior, Western Mining Action Project, Lyons, CO, Lynne Saxton, Environmental Law Foundation, James R. Wheaton, Public Interest Law Office, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Barclay T. Samford, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Denver, CO, Lane N. McFadden, Esquire, Brian C. Toth, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Charles Michael Oconnor, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees., James L. Buchal, Murphy & Buchal, LLP, Portland, OR, R. Dabney Eastham, Esquire, Ladas & Parry LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees.

Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest Service

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel *954 opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge RAWLINSON did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.