John Loudermilk v. Michael Danner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

John Loudermilk v. Michael Danner

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS JOHN LOUDERMILK and TIFFANY No. 10-15980 LOUDERMILK, individually and as parents and next friends of Brittany Renee D.C. No. 2:06-cv-00636-EHC Nash, Dakota James Loudermilk, Kristin District of Arizona, Grace Loudermilk, Faith Rose Phoenix Loudermilk, and Montana Vaughn Loudermilk, minor children,

ORDER

Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. MICHAEL DANNER,

Defendant - Appellant, RICHARD GAGNON,

Defendant - Appellant, JOSHUA RAY,

Defendant - Appellant, JOSEPH SOUSA, Maricopa County Deputy Sheriffs, individually and in their official capacity,

Defendant - Appellant, and JOSEPH M. ARPAIO,

Defendant, JULIE RHODES,

Defendant, RHONDA CASH,

Defendant, JENNA CRAMER,

Defendant. Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.

The memorandum disposition filed on September 12, 2011 is hereby amended by substituting “Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808 (9th Cir. 1999)” for “Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808 (9th Cir. 2009)” on page 4. No further petitions shall be entertained.

Reference

Status
Unpublished