United States v. Roberto Aguilar-Escobedo
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Roberto Aguilar-Escobedo appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2258, and we affirm.
Aguilar-Escobedo contends that his attorney was ineffective for failing to present a sentencing entrapment defense at trial. As the district court concluded, counsel’s representation did not fall below an objective standard of reasonableness. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
AFFIRMED.
**
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto AGUILAR-ESCOBEDO, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished