MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Lopez-Lara, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Renteria-Morales v. Mukasey, 551 F.3d 1076, 1080 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency correctly applied the modified categorical approach to determine that Lopez-Lara’s 2006 conviction for petty theft with a prior, in violation of Cal.Penal Code §§ 484 and 666, constituted an aggravated felony theft offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G). See United States v. Rivera, 658 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir. 2011) (generic crime of theft is “a taking of property or an exercise of control over property without consent with the criminal intent to deprive the owner of rights and benefits of ownership, even if such deprivation is less than total or permanent”) (alterations and citations omitted); id. at 1076 (where defendant receives sentence of at least one year, inclusive of sentencing enhancement, “petty theft con *612 victions under Cal.Penal Code §§ 484(a) and 666 satisfy the ‘at least one year’ sentence requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G)”). LopezALara therefore is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), and ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.