United States v. Benjamin Armenta-Icedo

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Benjamin Armenta-Icedo, 460 F. App'x 617 (9th Cir. 2011)

United States v. Benjamin Armenta-Icedo

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Benjamin Armenta-Icedo appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Armen-ta-Icedo’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Armenta-Icedo *618 with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin ARMENTA-ICEDO, A.K.A. Rogelio Peralta-Peralta, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished