John Hoskings v. Pat Vasquez
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
California state prisoner John Hoskings appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Hoskings contends that the Governor’s 2004 decision reversing the Board of Prison Terms’s decision finding him suitable *668 for parole is not supported by some evidence. The record reflects that Hoskings received all process that was due. See Swarthout v. Cooke, — U.S.-,- -, 131 S.Ct. 859, 862-63, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
**
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John HOSKINGS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. P.L. VAZQUEZ, Warden, Respondent—Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished