FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30215

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:02-cr-00133-SEH v.

MEMORANDUM * JACKSON BRYANT BAUGUS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Jackson Bryant Baugus appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion for return of property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Appellant. P. 34(a)(2).

Baugus contends that the district court improperly applied $7,724 in seized funds to an unsatisfied fine of $75,000 imposed in connection with his 2004 criminal judgment. Contrary to Baugus’s contention, the district court did not err. See 18 U.S.C. § 3613(c). Consideration of Baugus’s remaining claims is precluded pursuant to the doctrine of res judicata. See Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880, 892 & n.5 (2008); United States v. Bhatia, 545 F.3d 757, 759 (9th Cir. 2008); see also United States v. Baugus, Nos. 07-30046 and 07-30353, 2009 Westlaw 159228 (9th Cir. Jan 13, 2009).

AFFIRMED.

2 10-30215