U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Michael Jones

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2011 · Goodwin, Wallace, McKeown

463 F. App'x 649

Counsel

Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Joshua Robbins, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., W. Michael Mayock, Esquire, Law Office of W. Michael Mayock, Pasadena, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Bao Truong (9th Cir. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Michael Tredell Jones appeals from his 18-month sentence following his jury-trial convictions for conspiracy and counterfeiting obligations or securities of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 471. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and.we affirm.

Jones contends that the district court erred when it applied enchantments to his Guideline calculation pursuant to U.S.S.G. §§ 2B5.1(b)(2)(A) and (b)(3). In light of the jury’s verdict, the district court did not err in applying the enhancements. See United States v. Armstead, 552 F.3d 769, 777 (9th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.