United States v. Fidel Diaz-Lemus
United States v. Fidel Diaz-Lemus
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Fidel Diaz-Lemus appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Diaz-Lemus contends that the district court failed to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors in imposing the consecutive 12-month sentence, and that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not procedurally err and Diaz-Lemus’ within-Guidelines sentence is reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(a)(l), (f).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.