U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Perry v. Brown

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 23, 2011 · Hawkins, Reinhardt, Smith

639 F.3d 1153; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 7311 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

David Boies, Rosanne C. Baxter, Esquire, Counsel, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Armonk, NY, Jeremy Michael Goldman, Esquire, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Oakland, CA, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esquire, Christopher D. Dusseault, Theane Evangelis Kapur, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Ethan Douglas Dettmer, Esquire, Enrique Antonio Monagas, Sarah E. Piepmeier, Esquire, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, CA, Theodore Olson, Matthew McGill, Amir C. Tayrani, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, Theodore H. Uno, Bois Schiller & Flexner LLP, Hollywood, FL, Joshua Irwin Schiller, Richard Jason Bettan, Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., Vince Chhabria, Esquire, Dennis J. Herrera, City, Office of The City Attorney, Ronald P. Flynn, Therese Stewart, Chief Deputy City, Christine Van Aken, Deputy City, Erin Bernstein, Deputy City, Mollie Mindes Lee, Deputy City, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office, Danny Chou, San Francisco, CA, for Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee., Tamar Pachter, Deputy Attorney General, Daniel Powell, Deputy Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, Kenneth C. Mennemeier, Jr., Mennemeier, Glassman & Stroud LLP, Sacramento, CA, Claude Franklin Kolm, Esquire, Oakland, CA, Judy W. Whitehurst, Principal Deputy County Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants., Jesse Panuccio, David Thompson, Charles J. Cooper, Nicole Jo Moss, Peter A. Patterson, Cooper & Kirk, PLLC, Washington, DC, Andrew P. Pugno, Law Offices of Andrew P. Pugno, Folsom, CA, James Andrew Campbell, Litigation Staff Counsel, Brian William Raum, Senior Counsel, Alliance Defense Fund, Scottsdale, AZ, Terry L. Thompson, Law Office of Terry L. Thompson, Alamo, CA, for Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Perry v. Brown (9th Cir. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*1154ORDER

Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 1756, 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472 F.3d 1097, 1101 (9th Cir. 2006), we deny Plaintiffs’ motion at this time.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.