U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

McComish v. Bennett

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 10, 2011 · Kleinfeld, Tashima, Thomas

653 F.3d 1106; 2011 WL 3487065 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Clint Bolick, Esquire, Nicholas Constantine Dramas, Esquire, Gustavo Enrique Schneider, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., Michael Eugene Bindas, William Randolph Maurer, Jeanette Motee Petersen, Seattle, WA, Timothy D. Keller, Tempe, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees., Mary O’Grady, James Evans Barton, II, Assistant Attorney General, Timothy A. Nelson, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants-Appellants., Elisabeth Jill Neubauer, Munger, Tolies & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Stephen M. Hoersting, Counsel, Alexandria, VA, for Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

McComish v. Bennett (9th Cir. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court in Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 2806, 180 L.Ed.2d 664 (2011), the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.