U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Pool

United States v. Pool
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 19, 2011 · Bea, Fletcher, Graber, Ikuta, Kozinski, Murguia, Paez, Pregerson, Rymer, Smith
659 F.3d 761; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19260; 2011 WL 4359899 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Pool

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

We have been advised that Pool has entered a guilty plea. The parties agree there is no longer a live controversy, and the case is moot. See In re Pattullo, 271 F.3d 898, 900 (9th Cir. 2001) (“If a case becomes moot while pending on appeal, it must be dismissed.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, vacate the panel’s opinion, vacate the district court’s and magistrate judge’s orders and remand with instructions to dismiss the action. See United *762States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

The oral argument set for September 20, 2011 in San Francisco, California is vacated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.