Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison
Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The court invites supplemental briefs by any amicus curiae addressing the following questions: Does Stern v. Marshall, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 2594, 180 L.Ed.2d 475 (2011), prohibit bankruptcy courts from entering a final, binding judgment on an action to avoid a fraudulent conveyance? If so, may the bankruptcy court hear the proceeding and submit a report and recommendation to a federal district court in lieu of entering a final judgment?
Any briefs responding to this order shall be filed no later than thirty days from the filed date of this order. All briefs shall
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.