U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

Wahl v. Belleque

Wahl v. Belleque
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 5, 2011 · Clifton, Goodwin, Wallace
407 F. App'x 236

Wahl v. Belleque

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Oregon state prisoner Robert L. Wahl, Jr. appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

*237Wahl contends that the district court erred in failing to reach the merits of his procedurally defaulted claims because the new reliable evidence of “actual innocence” under Schlup v. Delo, 518 U.S. 298, 327, 115 S.Ct. 851, 130 L.Ed.2d 808 (1995), excuses his default. Wahl bases his claim of actual innocence on the victim’s written affidavit recanting her accusations against him. Wahl has failed to show that, based on this evidence, it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518, 126 S.Ct. 2064, 165 L.Ed.2d 1 (2006). Therefore, the district court did not err in declining to reach the merits of the procedurally defaulted claims.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.