U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Perez-Luna

United States v. Perez-Luna
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 15, 2011 · Bybee, Farris, Leavy
421 F. App'x 733

United States v. Perez-Luna

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Alberto Perez-Luna appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 21-month *734sentence for reentry of removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Perez-Luna’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief have been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.