U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Mann

United States v. Mann
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 11, 2011 · Bea, Clifton, Fletcher
426 F. App'x 541

United States v. Mann

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Christopher Lee Mann appeals from the consecutive 44-month and 24-month sentences imposed following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand for resentencing.

*542Mann contends that the district court procedurally erred by relying on factors excluded from 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). It is unclear from the record whether those factors served as the primary basis for the sentences imposed. See United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir. 2006); see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062 (9th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we vacate and remand for resentencing.

In light of this disposition, we decline to reach Mann’s other arguments.

VACATED; REMANDED for resentencing.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.