U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Integlia

United States v. Integlia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 27, 2011
434 F. App'x 713

United States v. Integlia

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Carmen de Oliveira Integlia appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 18-month sentence for mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Oliveira Integlia’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion *714to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.