United States v. Rosendo Rodriguez-Zetina

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Rosendo Rodriguez-Zetina, 469 F. App'x 630 (9th Cir. 2012)

United States v. Rosendo Rodriguez-Zetina

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 29 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10081

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-01329-GMS-1 v.

MEMORANDUM * ROSENDO RODRIGUEZ-ZETINA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Rosendo Rodriguez-Zetina appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 41- month sentence for being found in the United States after removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriguez-Zetina’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief,

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 11-10081

Reference

Status
Unpublished