U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

Eduardo Romero-Zepeda v. Eric H. Holder Jr

Eduardo Romero-Zepeda v. Eric H. Holder Jr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 29, 2012 · Fernandez, McKeown, Bybee
469 F. App'x 512

Eduardo Romero-Zepeda v. Eric H. Holder Jr

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioners Eduardo Romero-Zepeda and Elvia Romero, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of then* application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their U.S. citizen children. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir. 2009).

Petitioners’ contention that the IJ failed to properly consider and weigh all evidence of hardship does not raise a color-able due process claim. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.