Richard Stengel v. Medtronic Incorporated
Richard Stengel v. Medtronic Incorporated
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD STENGEL; MARY LOU STENGEL, No. 10-17755 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. D.C. No. 4:10-cv-00318-RCC MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation, ORDER Defendant-Appellee. Filed July 25, 2012
ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Wardlaw, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.
8563
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.