U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris

Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 25, 2012

Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL;  REGINALD ENTO; JEFFREY PATRICK LYONS, JR.; AAKASH DESAI, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, No. 10-15152 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.  D.C. No. 3:09-cv-04779-CRB KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney ORDER General of California; EVA STEINBERGER, Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA Programs, California Department of Justice, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed July 25, 2012

ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Nguyen, Watford and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.

8561

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.