Sugey Milagros v. Eric Holder, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Sugey Milagros v. Eric Holder, Jr., 465 F. App'x 607 (9th Cir. 2012)
Goodwin, Wallace, McKeown

Sugey Milagros v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Sugey Guadarrama Milagros, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.

*608 The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Guadarrama Milagros’ motion to reopen because it considered the evidence submitted and acted within its broad discretion in determining Guadarrama Milagros did not demonstrate prima facie eligibility for the relief sought. See INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104-05, 108 S.Ct. 904, 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988) (the BIA may deny a motion to reopen for failure to establish a prima facie case for the underlying relief sought). We reject Guadarrama Milagros’ contention that the BIA failed to address any of her claims.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
Sugey GUADARRAMA MILAGROS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Status
Unpublished