Rodolfo Velasquez v. Chase Home Finance LLC
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Rodolfo Velasquez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his *637 action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order entered on January 10, 2011, dismissing Velasquez’s action.
Velasquez’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
We do not consider Velasquez’s contentions raised for the first time on appeal. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).
AFFIRMED.
**
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Rodolfo VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC; Fannie Mae, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished