United States v. Jack Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Jack Williams

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50453

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00099-SJO v.

MEMORANDUM * JACK BENNY WILLIAMS, a.k.a. Snow,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 17, 2012 ** Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Jack Benny Williams appeals his 18-month sentence imposed for selling counterfeit currency of the United States with intent to defraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 473. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Williams’s

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Williams the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 10-50453

Reference

Status
Unpublished