American General Life & Accident v. Bin Wu

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

American General Life & Accident v. Bin Wu

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 14 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE AND No. 10-55171 ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-05608-CAS-JC Plaintiff, and, MEMORANDUM * BIN WU; JUN WU; NING WU,

Defendants-cross-defendants - Appellees,

v.

SHIN P. YANG, DBA The Law Offices of Shin P. Yang,

Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted February 9, 2012 ** Pasadena, California

Before: D.W. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Shin P. Yang appeals the district court’s denial of attorneys’ fees on a theory

of quantum meruit. The district court found that Yang’s clients were not unjustly

enriched. This factual determination was not clearly erroneous. Husain v.

Olympic Airways, 316 F.3d 829, 835 (9th Cir. 2002).

AFFIRMED.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished