American General Life & Accident v. Bin Wu
American General Life & Accident v. Bin Wu
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 14 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE AND No. 10-55171 ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-05608-CAS-JC Plaintiff, and, MEMORANDUM * BIN WU; JUN WU; NING WU,
Defendants-cross-defendants - Appellees,
v.
SHIN P. YANG, DBA The Law Offices of Shin P. Yang,
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted February 9, 2012 ** Pasadena, California
Before: D.W. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Shin P. Yang appeals the district court’s denial of attorneys’ fees on a theory
of quantum meruit. The district court found that Yang’s clients were not unjustly
enriched. This factual determination was not clearly erroneous. Husain v.
Olympic Airways, 316 F.3d 829, 835 (9th Cir. 2002).
AFFIRMED.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished