United States v. Kevin Belone

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Kevin Belone

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEB 22 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10220

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-08126-NVW v.

MEMORANDUM * KEVIN JAMES BELONE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Kevin James Belone appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for voluntary manslaughter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1112 and 1153. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Belone’s counsel has filed a

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2 11-10220

Reference

Status
Unpublished