United States v. Kevin Freeman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Kevin Freeman

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 20 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S . CO U RT OF AP PE A LS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50139

Plaintiff - Appellee, DC No. 2:03-cr-0072 PA v.

MEMORANDUM * KEVIN FREEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 6, 2012** Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Kevin Freeman appeals from the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. y 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. y 1291, and we affirm.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).

Freeman contends that the district court abused its discretion by declining to reduce his sentence based on the retroactive amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that lowered penalties for cracµ cocaine offenses. The district court acted within its discretion in denying Freeman a reduction in his sentence. See U.S.S.G. y 1B1.10(b)(2)(B) (2010) ('If the original term of imprisonment constituted a non-guideline sentence determined pursuant to 18 U.S.C. y 3553(a) and United States v. Booµer, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a further reduction generally would not be appropriate.'); Dillon v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2691-92 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

2 11-50139

FILED United States v. Freeman, No. 11-50139 MAR 20 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: U.S . CO U RT OF AP PE A LS

I dissent.

Page 1 of 1

Reference

Status
Unpublished