United States v. David Najimias-Nacach
United States v. David Najimias-Nacach
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 18 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50269 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:11-cr-00225-IEG-1 v. MEMORANDUM * DAVID NAJIMIAS-NACACH, AKA David Herrera-Roman, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Irma E. Gonzalez, Chief District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 17, 2012 **
Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
David Najimias-Nacach appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for attempted entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Najimias-Nacach’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Najimias-Nacach has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
AFFIRMED.
2 11-50269
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.