U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Daryl Glenn

United States v. Daryl Glenn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 25, 2012

United States v. Daryl Glenn

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 25 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10270 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:08-cr-00023-OWW v. MEMORANDUM * DARYL CURTIS GLENN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 17, 2012 ** Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Daryl Curtis Glenn appeals from his jury conviction and 180-month sentence for two counts of receipt or distribution of material involving the sexual exploitation of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Glenn’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

We have provided Glenn the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 10-10270

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.