United States v. Justo Revolorio-Gonzalez
United States v. Justo Revolorio-Gonzalez
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 21 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10567 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:11-cr-01207-DCB v. MEMORANDUM * JUSTO REVOLORIO-GONZALEZ, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Daniel L. Hovland, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted May 15, 2012 *** Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Justo Revolorio-Gonzalez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** Daniel L. Hovland, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
15-month sentence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Revolorio-Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 11-10567
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.