U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Felipe Diaz-Flores

United States v. Felipe Diaz-Flores
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 19, 2012 · Schroeder, Silverman, Thomas
474 F. App'x 647

United States v. Felipe Diaz-Flores

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Felipe Diaz-Flores appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 90-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Diaz-Flores’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.