U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez

United States v. Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 19, 2012

United States v. Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 19 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10247 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cr-02746-DCB-GEE-1 v. MEMORANDUM * JESUS ORLANDO HERNANDEZ- RAMIREZ, AKA Jesus Orlando Hernandez, AKA Jesus Hernandez- Ramirez, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 17, 2012 ** Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Orlando Hernandez-Ramirez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for attempted illegal reentry by a previously removed alien,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hernandez-Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 10-10247

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.