Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

Richard Stengel v. Medtronic Incorporated

Richard Stengel v. Medtronic Incorporated
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 25, 2012 · Kozinski
686 F.3d 1121; 2012 WL 3039710; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15379 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Richard Stengel v. Medtronic Incorporated

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be dted as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

*1122 Judges Wardlaw, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑