Save the Peaks Coalition v. United States Forest Service
Save the Peaks Coalition v. United States Forest Service
Opinion of the Court
Order; Dissent by
ORDER
Our order filed on June 21, 2012 (ECF No. 77) is hereby amended. All portions of the order, except the portion denying Intervenor-Defendanb-Appellee Arizona Snowbowl Resort Limited Partnership’s (Snowbowl) motion for attorney’s fees, are withdrawn, Snowbowl’s motion for costs is denied, and our referral of the order to the Appellate Commissioner is withdrawn.
In light of these amendments, Attorney Plaintiffs’/Appellants Save the Peaks Coalitions’ July 5, 2012 Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied, as moot.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting:
I respectfully dissent. I would impose sanctions on Shanker for “grossly abuspng] the judicial process by strategically holding back claims that could have, and should have, been asserted in the first lawsuit (and would have been decided earlier but for counsel’s procedural errors in raising those claims).” Save the Peaks Coal. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 669 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir. 2012).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.