U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

Stenly Rantung v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Stenly Rantung v. Eric Holder, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 18, 2012 · Wardlaw, Clifton, Smith
479 F. App'x 137

Stenly Rantung v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Stenly Laloan Rantung, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

Rantung’s only argument is that his case should be remanded for the agency to assess his withholding of removal claim *138 under the disfavored group analysis. We reject Rantung’s argument in light of our prior decision, Rantung v. Mukasey, 291 Fed.Appx. 859, (9th Cir. Sept. 10, 2008), in which this court applied the disfavored group analysis to Rantung’s withholding of removal claim and rejected his claim. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.