U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Karl Cascketta

United States v. Karl Cascketta
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 19, 2012 · Wardlaw, Clifton, Smith
479 F. App'x 153

United States v. Karl Cascketta

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Karl John Cascketta appeals from the revocation of his supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Cascketta’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cascketta the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.