U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Armando Porras-Cordero

United States v. Armando Porras-Cordero
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 20, 2012 · Wardlaw, Clifton, Smith
479 F. App'x 796

United States v. Armando Porras-Cordero

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Armando Porras-Cordero appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 64-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Porras-Cordero’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Porras-Cordero the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.