U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

Bernardo Cruz-Mosquera v. K. Gurries

Bernardo Cruz-Mosquera v. K. Gurries
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 25, 2012 · Wardlaw, Clifton, Smith
481 F. App'x 399

Bernardo Cruz-Mosquera v. K. Gurries

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Nevada state prisoner Bernardo Cruz-Mosquera appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to exhaust. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Cruz-Mosquera’s action because he failed to exhaust administrative remedies. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 85, 93-95, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (holding that “proper exhaustion” is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.