United States v. Edward Garcia
United States v. Edward Garcia
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Edward Alan Garcia appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Garcia contends that the district court procedurally erred because it failed to ex *886 plain adequately the sentence imposed. The record belies this contention. The district court considered the parties’ arguments and the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, and sufficiently explained its decision to impose an above-Guidelines sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.