U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

Alexis Degelmann v. Advanced Medical Optics Inc.

Alexis Degelmann v. Advanced Medical Optics Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 30, 2012

Alexis Degelmann v. Advanced Medical Optics Inc.

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALEXIS DEGELMANN and JOSEPH  No. 10-15222 LIN, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 4:07-cv-03107-PJH v.  Northern District of California, ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS INC., a Oakland Delaware corporation, ORDER Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 11, 2011—San Francisco, California Filed October 30, 2012 Before: John T. Noonan and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Raner C. Collins, District Judge.*

COUNSEL Jahan C. Sagafi, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs- appellants.

Ben D. Whitwell, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellee.

*The Honorable Raner C. Collins, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Arizona, sitting by designation.

13029 13030 DEGELMANN v. ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS ORDER Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Each party shall pay its own costs and fees of this appeal. A certified copy of this order served on the dis- trict court shall constitute the mandate. The prior panel opin- ion is VACATED.

PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2012 Thomson Reuters.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.