U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

Krystle Agustin v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Krystle Agustin v. Eric Holder, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 16, 2012 · Canby, Trott, Fletcher
487 F. App'x 383

Krystle Agustin v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Krystle Macapagal Agustín, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying her request for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance, Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Agustin’s request for a continuance where she failed to show good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; cf. Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012-15 (good cause shown for continuance to await adjudication of 1-140 appeal).

Agustin’s request regarding prosecutorial discretion is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.