MEMORANDUM **

B. Spain appeals pro se from the district court’s order imposing a pre-filing *412 restriction on him as a vexatious litigant. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1146 (9th Cir. 1990). We affirm in part and dismiss in part.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by entering a pre-filing order against Spain after giving him notice and an opportunity to be heard, developing an adequate record for review, making findings regarding Spain’s frivolous and harassing litigation history, and tailoring the restriction narrowly. See id. at 1147-48 (explaining factors for entry of pre-filing order).

We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s judgment dismissing Spain’s action because Spain failed to file a timely notice of appeal from that decision. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), (4) (notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of order disposing of timely post-judgment tolling motion). Accordingly, we dismiss that portion of the appeal.

Defendants’ request for attorney’s fees is denied without prejudice to a separately filed motion on the issue. See Fed. R.App. P. 38.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.