MEMORANDUM **

J. Jesus Vega-Arroyo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Vega-Arroyo contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the indictment. He asserts that his underlying removal order is defective because his waiver of his right to counsel in the removal proceedings was ineffective. We review this claim de novo. See United, States v. Reyes-Bonilla, 671 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. --, 133 S.Ct. 322, 184 L.Ed.2d 190 (2012).

Vega-Arroyo was required to prove actual prejudice in relation to his claim of ineffective waiver of his right to counsel, because he had a prior aggravated felony conviction at the time of the removal proceedings. See id. at 1049. Because Vega-Arroyo made no attempt to prove actual prejudice, the district court properly denied his motion to dismiss the indictment.

AFFIRMED.