U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Flores-Rodriguez

United States v. Flores-Rodriguez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 23, 2012 · Bybee, Fernandez, McKeown
468 F. App'x 801

United States v. Flores-Rodriguez

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Israel Flores-Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Flores-Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.