NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 09 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS JOSE E. HERNANDEZ, No. 12-17669 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-00369-MMD- CWH v. INDYMAC BANK; et al., MEMORANDUM * Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda Du, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 8, 2013 **

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, CANBY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Jose Hernandez appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.